Reducing the amount of transmitted engine and propeller vibration to the airframe of an aircraft is one of the most challenging tasks of an aircraft engineer.  Vibration is indeed the enemy.  But, just how much vibration is too much vibration?  Most would answer that question with, the lesser the better.  It's true, the less vibration the less component fatigue and the more comfortable the flight experience.

The dilemma facing the aircraft designer is that of building an aircraft with the component strengths necessary for a rigid airframe, yet with the flexibility to dissipate vibration.  The more rigid the airframe, the harder it is to dampen vibration.  Why?  Because firm structures are better transmitters of movement.  Vibration is repetitive movement.  Traditionally, vibration is controlled by the engine mounting system.  The engine mounting plate is isolated from the airframe by rubber dampeners.  The dampeners reduce the conductance of vibration from the engine to adjacent components by having a layer of rubber in between any part of the contact area.  This rubber intermediate compresses and expands to absorb the engine movement, therefore preventing the continuation of that movement to the airframe.  The types of mounts vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, but they all serve the same purpose; there is a single vibrating media, the engine, which is isolated by the rubber intermediate component.  Different densities of rubber (durometer) can be chosen for the mechanical and frequency characteristics of the application.  Have you ever grabbed the ring of a Blue Heron PPC and given it a shake, or picked it up off the ground?  It's solid!  This quality, which we all admire, has further challenged us to a new level of engineering accomplishment which has reversed the odds of vibration control.  The recently developed Dual Media Isolation System is revolutionizing the mechanics by which we reduce vibration.

The Dual Media Isolation System uses a two-tier approach to vibration dampening.  First, the engine plate (media #1) is rubber-shock mounted to the cross mount components of the airframe.  This allows the engine to move, reducing the amount of vibration transmission to the cross mount.  Although in this configuration the cross mount does not vibrate nearly as much as the engine, it continues to transmit a certain percentage of the vibration energy produced.  Next, the cross mount component (media #2) is shock-mounted at its attachment point to the main airframe.  This final isolation allows the cross mount to move as an intermediate media, taking the previously reduced amount of vibration energy, and diminishing it even further.

Use of the Dual Media Isolation System results in a flight experience that is unprecedented in comfort.  The difference is so dramatic from that of any other aircraft that we had to do a comparative test.  The test we performed compared the relative vibration energy transmission to the pylon tubes of the blue Heron airframe at all frequency levels.  The results are plotted below, and the advantage of this new system is visibly obvious.  As the traditional single media method shows a steady increase in vibration energy from 3000 rpm to full throttle, the dual media method is distinguished in its ability to actually reduce the amount of transmitted energy as the vibration frequencies increase with engine speed.

The Best Of Both Worlds.  Blue Heron pilots can now have the strongest airframe and the smoothest ride. 2001 model aircraft come with the Dual Media Isolation System as standard equipment.  Current Blue Heron owners can upgrade their mounting system as well by contacting their Blue Heron dealer.

 

  

Oscilloscope Displays and Comparative Vibration Measurements

         

 

     
   

Back To Previous Page